Buoy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Brandon Buoy |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
3:2024cv01086 |
July 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Youlee Yim You |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance of Justin Lane Martin appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Martin, Justin) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Granting attorney Maren Miller Bam's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 for Plaintiff. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9482567. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh) |
Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Maren Miller Bam. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9482567. Filed by Brandon Buoy. (Bam, Maren) |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Maren Miller Bam. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9482567 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (dino) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh) |
Filing 5 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (gd) |
Filing 4 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (gd) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance of Kevin C. Danielson appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Danielson, Kevin) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Brandon Buoy. (Bordelon, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Plaintiff consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Filed by Brandon Buoy against Commissioner Social Security Administration Social Security Answer is due by 10/31/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Bordelon, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Buoy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Justin Lane Martin |
Represented By: | Kevin C. Danielson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brandon Buoy | |
Represented By: | Maren Miller Bam |
Represented By: | Jeremy L. Bordelon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.