Klepacki et al v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
| Nathan Klepacki and Anna Shih |
| Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 3:2024cv01466 |
| September 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Amy M Baggio |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance of Mitchel Wilson appearing on behalf of Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Filed by on behalf of Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Wilson, Mitchel) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Attorney Withdrawal: Edward L. Kelinsky Only Filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Kastan, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES of Proceedings: Rule 16 Telephone Conference held. The Court set the following case schedule: Add Parties/Amend Complaint by 12/2/2024. Discovery is to be completed by 3/3/2025. Expert Disclosures are due by 7/7/2025. Expert Discovery is due by 9/4/2025. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/3/2025. Dispositive Motions are due by 4/10/2025. Oral Argument is set for 7/21/2025 at 01:30PM in Portland Courtroom 14B before Judge Amy M Baggio. Pretrial Order is due by 9/30/2025. Pretrial Conference is set for 11/7/2025 at 01:30PM in Portland Courtroom 14B before Judge Amy M Baggio. A 6-day Jury Trial is set for 11/17/2025 at 09:00AM in Portland Courtroom 14B before Judge Amy M Baggio. Dispositive motions, pretrial conference, or trial dates will not be moved. Case procedures discussed. Connor Barnes present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Edward L. Kelinsky present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Ryan White. Judge Amy M. Baggio presiding. (jp) |
| Filing 6 Joint Status Report . Filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Kastan, Joshua) |
Filing 5
Scheduling Order. A Rule 16 Telephone Conference is set for 10/2/2024 at 09:30AM before Judge Amy M. Baggio. Counsel are required to confer prior to the conference. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. The Court directs the parties to file a jointly proposed schedule by noon two business days before the hearing. Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (jp)
|
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 . Filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Kastan, Joshua) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Amy M Baggio and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 1/2/2025. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/3/2025. Pretrial Order is due by 2/3/2025. Ordered by Judge Amy M Baggio. (dino)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Diversity Statement. Filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Kastan, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 24CV37787 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9561367 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Affidavit of Service). (Kastan, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
