Moye v. TriMet et al
| Brandon Moye, Sr. |
| State of Oregon and TriMet |
| 3:2024cv01950 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF #1 . Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #2 ) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim showing the Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Motion for Order, ECF #4 , is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before January 24, 2025, if Plaintiff believes he can cure the deficiencies identified in this Order. If Plaintiff fails timely to file an amended complaint, the Court will enter a judgment dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed on 1/3/2025 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/3/2025.) (mja)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Order. Filed by Brandon Moye, Sr. (gd) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/25/2024.) (gd) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Brandon Moye, Sr against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (gd) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Brandon Moye, Sr. (gd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
