Burnett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
| Stanton Burnett |
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| 3:2025cv02007 |
| October 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint Stipulation OF DISMISSAL by Stanton Burnett. Filed by Stanton Burnett. (Tucker, Stacy) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Settlement Filed by Stanton Burnett. (Tucker, Stacy) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER - The Court ADOPTS the deadlines outlined in the parties' joint status report and proposed case schedule (ECF #10 ) as follows: (1) Production of relevant, non-privileged claim file materials to be completed by March 2, 2026; (2) Joining of additional parties to be completed by March 2, 2026; (3) Joint ADR report is due not later than April 10, 2026; (4) Administrative record is due not later than May 4, 2026; (5) Rule 52 motions are due not later than May 15, 2026; (6) Responses to Rule 52 motions are due not later than June 12, 2026; and (7) Replies in support of Rule 52 motions are due not later than June 26, 2026. ORDER - No party may file a discovery motion without prior leave of Court. If a discovery dispute remains after the parties have conferred thoroughly and in good faith, any party may contact the Courtroom Deputy to schedule a discovery telephone conference with the Court. The parties will be asked to send the Courtroom Deputy before the conference a brief email that succinctly states (without attaching exhibits) the nature of the discovery dispute and each party's respective position.Finally, if a party uses artificial intelligence to perform legal research or analysis for any document filed with the court, the party must independently verify the existence and accuracy of any cited cases. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 10 Joint Status Report and Proposed Case Schedule. Filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Swale, Sarah) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by attorney Sarah E. Swale, ECF #6 . Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Sarah E. Swale. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10052099 #6 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (dino) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Sarah E. Swale. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10052099. Filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Laura T. Morse appearing on behalf of UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Filed by on behalf of UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Morse, Laura) |
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America waiver sent on 10/31/2025. Filed by Stanton Burnett. (Tucker, Stacy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (dino) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/27/2026. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/30/2026. Pretrial Order is due by 3/30/2026. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (dino)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10044212 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Stanton Burnett against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Tucker, Stacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burnett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stanton Burnett | |
| Represented By: | Stacy Monahan Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Sarah E. Swale |
| Represented By: | Laura T. Morse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
