Tafoya v. Hendricks
| Chrisopher Alan Tafoya |
| Hendricks |
| 3:2026cv00435 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jeff Armistead |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO AMEND: the court ORDERS that Tafoya must file an amended complaint within 30 days curing the deficiencies noted above if he wishes to proceed with this case. Tafoya is advised that if he does not file an amended complaint within the time provided, this action will be dismissed as required under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). The dismissal will be without prejudice to Tafoyas right to pursue any appropriate claims in state court. Tafoya has not established exceptional circumstances at this juncture of the proceedings and, therefore, the court DENIES Tafoyas motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #3 )). See Agyeman v. Corrections Corporation of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). This does not preclude the court from determining at a later date, if circumstances warrant, to exercise its discretion to seek representation from a member of the districts pro bono attorney panel. Signed on 4/16/26 by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/16/26.) (eo)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Tafoyas application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections, Central Trust Unit must collect payments from Tafoyas prison trust account and forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court in accordance with the formula set forth above until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments must be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send an electronic copy of this order to: [email protected]. A copy of this order has been emailed to the Central Trust Unit. Signed on 4/16/26 by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/16/26.) (eo)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/5/2026.) (jw) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Tafoya. (jw) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Tafoya against Hendricks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (jw) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Tafoya. (jw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/5/2026: #1 Proposed Order) (jw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tafoya v. Hendricks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hendricks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chrisopher Alan Tafoya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
