J.B. et al v. State of Oregon et al
| J.B., J.S., K.S. and T.B. |
| State of Oregon, Kimberly Copeland, Richard Hill, Karen Brazeau, Robert Jester, Bobby Mink, Gary Lawhead, Mike Conzoner, Darin Humphreys, Brian Florip, Michael Jordan, Marcia Adams, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Sly, Staffer #1, Staffer #2, Staffer #3 and Staffers #4-20 |
| 3:2026cv00460 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Joint Status Report . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ross, Jeremiah) |
Filing 13
Stipulated Common Protective Order. Signed on 4/8/2026 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
| Filing 12 MINUTES of Proceedings: Status Conference held before Judge Michael J. McShane on April 3, 2026. One of the Janci cases will begin trial November 2, 2026, with location to be determined. The Pretrial Conference for that case will be set for 9:00 a.m. on October 19, 2026, in Portland before Judge Michael J. McShane. Second trial will begin January 4, 2027 with one of the Merrithew cases. Location to be determined. Third case will be one of the Kafoury cases. Location to be determined. Parties to provide status report indicating if the parties in any case consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Other judges will likely hear some or perhaps all of the cases following the November 2026 trial. Court extends deadlines: For cases filed before December 2025, fact discovery ends June 15, 2026, Expert disclosures are due July 15, 2026, dispositive motions are due August 6, 2026 with responses due August 27, 2026, and replies due September 10, 2026. Parties to confer on discovery deadlines for cases filed December 2025 and later and provide proposed deadlines to the Court. Parties will generally have to rely on depositions taking place in the coming weeks. If a party feels a second deposition is needed, they will need to demonstrate cause and identify targeted issues. But generally Plaintiffs' counsel in all the cases should work together to ensure the upcoming depositions capture all the necessary information. ORDER: Redacted complaints are to be provided unredacted under attorney's eyes only designation. If there are third party reporters, the parties will have to come to the Court for a process to give those third parties the opportunity to speak with attorneys or not. For expunged records, the Court understands that there may not be records. But the Court agrees with the Plaintiffs on this issue and the expungement statute is to protect the youths, not keep the youth from accessing records. If there are records, the state needs to turn them over to the youth. Jeremiah Vail Ross present as counsel for plaintiffs. Nathaniel Aggrey and Jessica Kampfe present as counsel for defendants. Court Reporter: Jill Jessup. Judge Michael J. McShane presiding. (gw) |
| Filing 11 Joint Status Report . Filed by J.B., J.S., K.S., T.B.. (Ross, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Dismissal of Party Kimberly Copeland . Filed by J.B., J.S., K.S., T.B.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Tollng Agreement-Copeland) (Ross, Jeremiah) |
| Filing 9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement . Filed by J.B., J.S., K.S., T.B.. (Ross, Jeremiah) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: As this case has been reassigned to Judge McShane, the Clerk is direct to STRIKE Judge Baggio's Civil Case Management Order 5 . Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (jp)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Amy M. Baggio to Judge Michael J. McShane. (cw) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: By 3/31/2026, the parties are directed to confer and file a Rule 26(f) report that includes a mutually agreed upon proposed discovery plan and proposed dates that are consistent with the scheduling information included in the Court's Civil Case Management Order 5 . If the parties cannot mutually agree upon a proposed discovery plan or proposed dates, the parties should include a brief explanation of the disagreement(s).For scheduling purposes, the parties are advised that the Court expects most civil cases to be resolved within 18 months of filing. Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (jp)
|
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) with Jury Demand . Nathaniel Aggrey. Filed by Michael Jordan, Brian Florip, Mike Conzoner, Gary Lawhead, Karen Brazeau, Richard Hill, Darin Humphreys, State of Oregon, Marcia Adams, Robert Jester. (Aggrey, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance of Donna L. Lee appearing on behalf of Kimberly Copeland. Filed by on behalf of Kimberly Copeland. (Lee, Donna) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Amy M. Baggio and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 7/8/2026. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/7/2026. Pretrial Order is due by 8/7/2026. Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (sb)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 26CV05532 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10189481 issued.. Filed by Michael Jordan, Brian Florip, Mike Conzoner, Gary Lawhead, Karen Brazeau, Richard Hill, Darin Humphreys, State of Oregon, Marcia Adams, Robert Jester (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet). (Aggrey, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
