Borge v. Penske Corporation et al
| Dale Borge |
| Penske Corporation, Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Douglas Blackley, King Biggs Shipping, LLC and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Home Depot |
| 3:2026cv00536 |
| March 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: Joint Motion for Order for Extension of Time to Conduct Rule 26 Conference #15 is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
|
| Filing 15 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Rule 26 Conference. Filed by Dale Borge. (Stanfill, Samantha) |
| Filing 14 Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #9 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Purcell, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 Declaration of J. Randolph Pickett. Filed by Dale Borge. (Related document(s): Response in Opposition to Motion #12 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4) (Pickett, J.) |
| Filing 12 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #9 . J. Randolph Pickett,Hannah Shilling for Dale Borge. Filed by Dale Borge. (Pickett, J.) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Purcell, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Jonathan E. White . Filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction #9 .) (Purcell, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Oral Argument requested. Filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Purcell, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Penske Corporation. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Penske Automotive Group, Inc.. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
| Filing 4 Defendants Penske Corporation; Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation; and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.'s Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Corporation, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
| Filing 3 Corrected Civil Cover Sheet regarding Notice of Removal, #1 . Filed by Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Corporation, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation. (Tapio, Maryssa) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 7/20/2026. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/17/2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (gd)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 26CV09016 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-10201952 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Penske Corporation, Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Tapio, Maryssa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
