Lunstedt v. Steel
| John Walter Lunstedt |
| Lindsay Steel |
| 3:2026cv01020 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Adrienne Nelson |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 055 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Response to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 . Filed by John Walter Lunstedt. (gd) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by Lindsay Steel. (Dolma, Tsechu) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of pro bono counsel, ECF #6 , is DENIED. Plaintiff has not shown that he is likely to succeed on the merits, nor that the issues presented here are particularly complex. Therefore, there are not "extraordinary circumstances" warranting appointment of pro bono counsel. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/9/26.) (eo)
|
| Filing 6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by John Walter Lunstedt. (gd) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to suspend the local rules of civil procedure, ECF #4 , is DENIED. All parties to this case shall comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules of Civil Procedure, and Federal Rules of Evidence. Resources for self-represented litigants are available on the District's website at https://ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/representing-yourself. Signeded on 6/1/2026, by Judge Adrienne Nelson.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/1/26.) (eo) Modified on 6/2/2026, to correct docket text. (cw).
|
| Filing 4 Motion to Suspend Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Filed by John Walter Lunstedt. (gd) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Adrienne Nelson and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: The filing party shall print and serve this Order, the summonses, and all other documents issued by the Clerk at case initiation upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5(c). Discovery is to be completed by 9/21/2026. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/19/2026. Pretrial Order is due by 10/19/2026. Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/22/2026.) (gd)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued at Intake as to Lindsay Steel. (gd) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Receipt No. 116886. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by John Walter Lunstedt against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (gd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lunstedt v. Steel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Walter Lunstedt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lindsay Steel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
