Gurule v. City of Roseburg Oregon
| Richard Everett Lee Gurule |
| City of Roseburg Oregon |
| 6:2009cv06013 |
| January 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Douglas |
| Thomas M. Coffin |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 80 :Granting Motion to Dismiss 65 and plaintiff's claims against defendants Moore, Knott, Crouse, Carpenter and Young are dismissed with prejudice; Denying as moot Motion to Compel 74 . Signed on 1/8/10 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
80
Findings & Recommendation: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -- FRCP 12(b) 65 , should be granted and plaintiff's claims against defendants Moore, Knott, Crouse, Carpenter and Young should be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 74 should be denied as moot. This action should be dismissed. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 1/4/2010. Signed on 12/18/09 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (lae)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 63 : Granting Motion to Dismiss 53 . Signed on 9/14/09 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
63
Findings & Recommendation: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss FRCP 12(b) 53 should be allowed.Plaintiff's claims against defendants City of Roseburg, Oregon, the Douglas County Sheriff's Office, the Douglas County Inter-Agency Narcotics Team, and Det. Joseph Kaney should be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 9/8/2009. Signed on 8/21/09 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER: Denying Motion 29 ; Denying Motion 31 ; Denying Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 32 ); Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion for Order 34 . The Clerk is requested to provide plaintiff with a copy of the docket sheet in this cas e without the usual copy fee; Denying Motion to Compel 36 without prejudice. Defendants are allowed 30 days to either provide plaintiff with discovery material or to show cause in writing why plaintiff's motion shall not be allowed. The Clerk is requested to reset plaintiff's motion for the Court's consideration after the expiration of 30 days; Granting Motion for Leave 38 ; Granting Motion for Leave 41 . The Clerk is directed to file the "Proposed Third Amended Complaint " submitted with plaintiff's motion and it shall become the operative pleading before the Court; Denying as Moot Motion for Order 44 ; Denying as Moot Motion for Order 46 ; Denying as Moot Motion for Order 48 . Denying as Moot Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Petition 23 . Signed on 7/6/09 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 17 . Plaintiff's claims against defendants State of Oregon and Douglas County District Attorney are denied and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 5/14/09 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: Denying Motion for Disclosures 8 ; Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel 10 ; Denying Motion to Dismiss 11 . The Clerk is directed to send waiver of service packet to Defendant Douglas County Sheriff's Office through Douglas County Counsel. Signed on 4/8/09 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
17
Findings & Recommendation: Plaintiff's claims against defendants State of Oregon and Douglas County District Attorney Banta should be denied and these defendants should be dismissed with prejudice from plaintiff's action. Amended Complaint 6 . Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 4/27/2009. Signed on 4/8/09 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gurule v. City of Roseburg Oregon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Everett Lee Gurule | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Roseburg Oregon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
