Beckmann et al v. Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC et al
Corey D. Redding, Brandon McGanty, Inc., Cliff Beckmann and Marni K. Redding |
Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC, Rolland L. Dawson, Noel Howe, Christopher J. Hurley, John William Hopen, Van Katzman, Michael Tovar, William Langley, Charles L. Sartain, John and/or Jane Does 1-10 and E. Craig Suhrbier |
6:2009cv06283 |
October 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Eugene Office |
Marion |
Ann L Aiken |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Mary L. Moran. (lae) |
|
|
Filing 34 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Dismiss Complaint #22 Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendants Suhrbier and Hopen's Rule 12(B)(6) Motion by all plaintiffs. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kobak, Sara) |
|
Filing 32 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension Of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kobak, Sara) |
|
|
|
|
Filing 27 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss Complaint #22 . Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kobak, Sara) |
Filing 26 Answer to Complaint Defendnat Rolland L. Dawson's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim, Counterclaim all plaintiffs. Filed by Rolland L. Dawson. (Larsen, Janet) |
Filing 25 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP Application for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice. Filed by Rolland L. Dawson. (Larsen, Janet) |
Filing 24 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP Application for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice. Filed by Rolland L. Dawson. (Larsen, Janet) |
Filing 23 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Filed by E. Craig Suhrbier, John William Hopen. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss #22 .) (Petranovich, Milo) |
Filing 22 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Oral Argument requested. Filed by E. Craig Suhrbier, John William Hopen. (Petranovich, Milo) |
Filing 21 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand Affirmative Defenses and, Counterclaim against all plaintiffs. Filed by Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC, Van Katzman, Noel Howe, Christopher J. Hurley. (Wilson, Joel) |
Filing 20 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon John William Hopen served on 10/24/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 19 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon E. Craig Suhrbier served on 10/20/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 18 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon Rolland L. Dawson served on 10/24/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 17 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon William Langley served on 11/4/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 16 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon Christopher J. Hurley served on 10/19/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 15 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon Noel Howe served on 10/19/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 14 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon Van Katzman served on 10/19/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
Filing 13 Affidavit of Service of Complaint,, #2 upon Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC served on 10/19/2009 and Summons Filed by all plaintiffs. (Mandt, Heidi) |
|
Filing 11 Stipulation re Report #10 Stipulation for Entry of Case Scheduling Order by all parties. Filed by all parties. (Dulcich, Thomas) |
Filing 10 Report Report of Rule 26 Conference. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Dulcich, Thomas) |
|
Filing 8 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand. Filed by William Langley. (Ellis, Barnes) |
Filing 7 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (filed as Joint Motion for Extension of Deadline for Responding to Complaint). Filed by E. Craig Suhrbier, John William Hopen. (Hawkes, Peter) |
|
Filing 5 Monthly Corporate Disclosure Statement OF BEACON LAW ADVISORS, PLLC. Filed by all defendants. (Wilson, Joel) |
Filing 4 Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines. Filed by all defendants. (Wilson, Joel) |
Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement of Brandon McGanty, Inc.. Filed by Brandon McGanty, Inc.. (Mandt, Heidi) |
|
Filing 2 Complaint. Filing Fee in amount of $350 collected. Receipt No. 29583 issued. Summons issued as to Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC, Van Katzman, Noel Howe, Christopher J. Hurley, William Langley, Michael Tovar, Rolland Dawson, Charles Sartain, E. Craig Suhrbier, John Hopen. Jury Trial Requested: YES. Filed by Brandon McGanty, Inc., Cliff Beckmann, Corey D. Redding, Marni K. Redding against Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC, Van Katzman, Noel Howe, Christopher J. Hurley, William Langley, Michael Tovar, Rolland L. Dawson, Charles L. Sartain, E. Craig Suhrbier, John William Hopen, John and/or Jane Does 1-10. (msk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.