Jones v. U.S. Bancorp
Plaintiff: Troy Jones
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp
Case Number: 6:2010cv06133
Filed: May 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Eugene Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: Denying Defendant's Motion to Strike 43 ; Order Granting in Part Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 21 . Denied as to Plaintiff's race discrimination claims based on his termination and Granted as to Plaintiff's hostile work environment, IIED, and RIED claims. Signed on 7/11/2011 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. U.S. Bancorp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy Jones
Represented By: Leslie D. Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?