United States of America v. Lund et al
| United States of America |
| Robert A. Lund and Colleen L. Lund |
| 6:2012cv00062 |
| January 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene Office |
| Thomas M. Coffin |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER: Adopting Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation 69 and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 59 . Signed on 4/1/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 52 . Denying Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 34 ; Signed on 10/3/12 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (sln)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: denying Motions to Take Judicial Notice 40 , 41 , 42 and 43 ; granting Motion to Set Aside Default 39 ; granting Motion for Relief From Requirements to Confer 26 .FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 34 should be denied. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 9/17/2012. Signed on 8/31/2012 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (plb)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 31 ; Denying Motion for Extension of Time 15 ; Denying Motion to Dismiss 16 . Robert Lund is ordered to file a response to the complaint within 11 days of the date of this order. Signed on 8/1/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (plb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
