Samuels v. Deschutes County et al
| Richard Scott Samuels |
| Deschutes County Sheriff Blanton, Deschutes County, Deputy Tory Flory, Justin Greenslit and Ryan Paul |
| 6:2013cv00516 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Ann L. Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 31 is Granted. Signed on 3/11/2014 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's federal claims for conspiracy to commit civil rights violation and unlawful search and seizure and DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff is ORDERED to make his malicious prosecution claims more definite and certain within 30 days of the filing date of this order. Furthermore, for the reasons stated on the record, the court imposes sanctions of $48.75 on plaintiff's counsel, which is e quivalent to 15 minutes of defense counsel Sarah Mack's hourly rate 27 , for the delay caused by their failure to appear at oral argument. See Amended Minutes of Proceedings 28 and Declaration of Sarah Mack 27 for further details. Signed on October 16, 2013 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
