McKenzie Flyfishers et al v. McIntosh et al
| McKenzie Flyfishers and Steamboaters |
| John Eisenhauer, Bruce McIntosh, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Scott Patterson and U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers |
| 6:2013cv02125 |
| December 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Thomas M. Coffin |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 Endangered Species Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Motion for Judgment 133 . The court declines to enter final judgment at this time. Defendant is ordered to provide the court with a report regarding the status of the pending HGMPs before NMFS within ninety (90) days of the date of this order. Signed on 5/26/2015 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (plb) Modified to add "opinion and order" to document title on 5/27/2015 (ljb).
|
|
Filing
130
OPINION and ORDER: Denying Motion for Summary Judgment and Injunctive Relief 73 ; Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 87 , contingent upon defendants consulting with NMFS to establish a time frame for defendants to achieve a ten percent or less pHOS and submitting a proposal of the deadline to this court for approval. Defendants have ninety days to submit the proposal to the court. As such, the court declines to enter judgment until such time that it receives defendants' proposal. Signed on 3/13/15 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (kf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
