Voth v. Premo et al
| Frank E. Voth |
| Mr. Stephenson, State of Oregon, Jeff Premo, Mr. Martian, Captain Long, Jane/John Doe 1 Through 8 and Ms. Coffy |
| 6:2014cv00128 |
| January 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Garr M. King |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
JUDGMENT - Signed on 7/10/2014 by Judge Garr M. King. (pg)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Motion for Order to Show Cause 43 , Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 44 , and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 45 are DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery 37 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to comply with the Court's briefing schedule as to defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 35 as set out in this Order. Signed on 5/5/2014 by Judge Garr M. King. (pg)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in part. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motions for a temporary restraining order 3 and 4 , and requests for a special master and for the appointment of counsel are DENIED. Signed on 1/31/2014 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
