Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Hamilton v. General Mills, Inc. et al

Hamilton v. General Mills, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Christopher Hamilton
Defendant:	General Mills Sales, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2016cv00382
Filed:	February 29, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. McShane
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 2, 2016	Filing 52 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 47 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 50 is denied. Signed on 11/2/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) Modified to correct title of document on 11/3/2016 (ljb).
July 27, 2016	Filing 39 ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 18 is granted due to this Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 2 1(b)(6). Hamilton may amend his claim for statutory damages under the UTPA, but his claim for injunctive relief and quantum meruit are dismissed with prejudice. The additional issues in Defendants' Motion are denied as moot. Signed on 7/27/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 2, 2016

Filing 52 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 47 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 50 is denied. Signed on 11/2/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) Modified to correct title of document on 11/3/2016 (ljb).

July 27, 2016

Filing 39 ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 18 is granted due to this Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 2 1(b)(6). Hamilton may amend his claim for statutory damages under the UTPA, but his claim for injunctive relief and quantum meruit are dismissed with prejudice. The additional issues in Defendants' Motion are denied as moot. Signed on 7/27/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. General Mills, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: General Mills Sales, Inc.
Represented By:	Joanna T. Perini-Abbott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: General Mills, Inc.
Represented By:	Joanna T. Perini-Abbott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Hamilton
Represented By:	Adam R. Gonnelli
Represented By:	Bonner Charles Walsh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?