Alegre v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
||Mary E. Alegre
||Commissioner Social Security Administration
||July 12, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Eugene (6) Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 24, 2018
ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's (unopposed) Motion for Attorney Fees 28 . After considering Plaintiff's Motion, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby granted in the sum of $17,746.50 in attorney fees, out of which Plaintiff's attorney will refund to Plaintiff EAJA fees already received by counsel in the amount of $4296.76, as full settlement of all claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Defendant shall pay this amount to Plaintiff's counsel, Drew L. Johnson less an administrative assessment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(d). There are no other costs. Signed on 9/24/2018 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
|September 18, 2017
ORDER: Granting Stipulated Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 26 . After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney the sum of $4296.76 upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees. See Order for further details. Signed on 9/18/2017 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?