Activation Products (CAN) Inc., et al v. Wecker, et al
||Activation Products (CAN) Inc. and Ian Clark
||Stephen Heuer, Time Machine, LLC and Andreas Wecker
||November 16, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Eugene (6) Office
||Thomas M. Coffin
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 9, 2017
ORDER: Denying Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 6 . Plaintiffs' Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue 6 is DENIED. At plaintiffs' ; request,the Court will entertain a motion for a preliminary injunction after defendants have been served withnotice of this lawsuit. If plaintiffs file such a motion, they are free to request expedited consideration pursuant to L.R. 7-l(g). See, formal Order. Signed on 1/9/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rdr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?