Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Joel C. Jones
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	6:2017cv00153
Filed:	January 28, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2019	Filing 22 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 21 ) is GRANTED. Signed on 12/2/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
February 7, 2018	Filing 18 ORDER - Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees (ECF 16 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded $5,577.15 for attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets a llowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Ratliff, 560 U.S. at 593-94. Because Plaintiff has filed with the Court an assignment of EAJA fees to counsel (ECF 16-2), if Plaintiff has no debt subject to the Treasury Offset Program, then Defendant shall cause the check to be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney Tim Wilburn and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney. If Plaintiff owes a debt subject to the Treasury Offset Program, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed on 2/7/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2019

Filing 22 ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 21 ) is GRANTED. Signed on 12/2/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

February 7, 2018

Filing 18 ORDER - Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees (ECF 16 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded $5,577.15 for attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets a llowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Ratliff, 560 U.S. at 593-94. Because Plaintiff has filed with the Court an assignment of EAJA fees to counsel (ECF 16-2), if Plaintiff has no debt subject to the Treasury Offset Program, then Defendant shall cause the check to be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney Tim Wilburn and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney. If Plaintiff owes a debt subject to the Treasury Offset Program, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney. Signed on 2/7/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Janice E. Hebert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel C. Jones
Represented By:	Tim D. Wilborn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?