Schaefer v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.
Plaintiff: Casey Schaefer
Defendant: Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2017cv00769
Filed: May 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Jolie A. Russo
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 207 Fair Labor Standards Act - Maximum Hours
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Granting Motion for Judgment 12 . This action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party. Signed on 8/7/2017 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (plb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schaefer v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.
Represented By: Courtney Angeli
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Schleuning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey Schaefer
Represented By: Courtney Angeli
Represented By: Alysa Castro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?