Hunter v. Redhawk Network Security LLC
Zachary Hunter |
Redhawk Network Security LLC |
6:2017cv00962 |
June 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Eugene (6) Office |
Jolie A. Russo |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER: Adopting Judge Jolie A. Russo's Findings and Recommendation 33 ; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 22 is denied. Signed on 8/30/2018 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hunter v. Redhawk Network Security LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zachary Hunter | |
Represented By: | Nora Broker |
Represented By: | Beth Ann Creighton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Redhawk Network Security LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.