Packnett v. Bell-Co Holding Company et al
| Justin Packnett |
| Springfield Taco, Inc., Bell-Co Holding Company, Mike Sanders, Randy Jefferis, Redmond Taco, Inc. and Robin Merrell Sanders |
| 6:2017cv01637 |
| October 16, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Thomas M Coffin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Settlement Judicial Approval of Settlement Agreement Filed by All Defendants. (Riewald, David) |
| Filing 8 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Mary L. Moran. (plb) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES of Proceedings: Settlement Conference. Case settles. The Clerk is ordered to enter a 60-day order of dismissal. Quinn Kuranz present as counsel for plaintiff. David Riewald present as counsel for defendants. Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo presiding. (plb) |
Filing 6
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. Settlement Conference is set for 12/18/2017 at 09:00AM in Portland chambers 13A before Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. Presence of all parties with settlement authority is required. This includes anyone who will have input on the decision of whether or not to settle the case, such as a spouse, parent, or any other adviser who may be relied on for advice. Parties are ordered to submit a Settlement Document to the Court by 04:30PM on 12/14/2017, in which they make realistic proposals of what they are willing to offer or accept to resolve this case. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT. Signed on 12/10/2017 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (plb)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of David J. Riewald appearing on behalf of All Defendants Filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Riewald, David) |
|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/16/2018. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/19/2018. Pretrial Order is due by 3/19/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued) (kf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE: Electronic payment of outstanding filing fees is authorized. The filer should select the appropriate Pay Filing Fee event from the Pay Filing Fee menu. Filing Fee must be paid by 10/23/2017. (eo) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (kf) |
| Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5189787 Related Document: #1 Complaint. Filed by Justin Packnett. (Kuranz, Quinn) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Justin Packnett against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Kuranz, Quinn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
