Ainsworth et al v. Owenby et al
| Robert D Ainsworth, Tami L. Ainsworth, Karl G. Frink, Lucinda A. Frink, Elaine C. Griswold, Gordon D. Griswold, John K. Lindsey, Linda K. Lindsey, Suzanne R. Whitaker and William E. Whitaker |
| Howard Dee Brown, III, Guild Mortgage Company, Mark Allen Owenby, Michelle Annette Page, Bryan David Philp, Jenny Rebecca Silveira, Elisha Templeton and William Walter Templeton, Jr. |
| 6:2017cv01935 |
| December 1, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Michael J. McShane |
| Torts to Land |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER: Granting 59 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 3/27/2019 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
Filing
48
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 27 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is denied. Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted. Plai ntiffs RICO claims are therefore dismissed without prejudice. The Court defers any decision regarding its exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state-law nuisance claims pending a status conference with the parties. Signed on 8/17/2018 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.