Easton v. Shulkin et al
| Thomas Easton |
| Caroline M. Howell, Kristopher G. Kyes, Oregon DOT/DMV and Secretary David J. Shulkin |
| 6:2018cv00233 |
| February 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Ann L. Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER: State Defendants' motion 29 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's ADA claim against defendants Kyes and Oregon DMV/DOT is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have 21 days to seek leave to file a third amended complaint by properly supported motion. Signed on 7/2/2019 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Reconsideration 24 is GRANTED as to his request to file the Second Amended Complaint and DENIED as to his request for reconsideration. Signed on 12/18/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER: State defendants' Motion to Dismiss 10 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against state defendants are dismissed, with prejudice. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 13 must also be DENIED. The Stay issued by the Court, ECF no. 19, is lifted. Signed on 10/9/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
