Reeves v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al
| Williams Reeves and William Reeves |
| Steve Shelton, Reed Paulson, Oregon Department of Corrections, an agency of the State of Oregon, Heidi Montgomery, Christopher DiGiulio, Joe Bugher, Rachel Rowell and Oregon Department of Corrections |
| 6:2018cv01471 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Paul Papak to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (eo) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Paul Papak and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/11/2018. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/10/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 1/10/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (bd)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5512685 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Williams Reeves against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Burgess, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
