Neubarth v. Peters et al
Aaron Van Neubarth |
Collete Peters, Reed Paulsen and Brandom Kelly |
6:2018cv01730 |
September 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael J McShane |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerk's Notice of Mailing Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp #9 to Aaron Van Neubarth and ODOC. (kf) |
Filing 11 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver of Service is due by 12/17/2018. (Mailed copy of notice to plaintiff) (Emailed notice and complaint to ODOJ) (kf) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Aaron Van Neubarth. Filed by Aaron Van Neubarth. (kf) |
Filing 7 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP (long form). Filed by Aaron Van Neubarth. (kf) |
Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing Order #5 and long form IFP application to Neubarth. (kf) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (joha) (Copy Mailed to Plaintiff.) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Aaron Van Neubarth. (joha) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Aaron Van Neubarth against Brandom Kelly, Reed Paulsen, Collete Peters (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (joha) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Aaron Van Neubarth. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.