Olsovsky v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Paul Olsovsky |
Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
6:2018cv01947 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mustafa T Kasubhai |
Contract: Other Contract Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Scheduling Order: Rule 16 Conference is set for 1/8/2019 at 10:30AM in Eugene by telephone before Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. The Court will initiate the call. The parties should be prepared to discuss the status of discovery, any actual or potential discovery related conflicts, consent to a magistrate judge, potential trial dates, other issues presented by this action, and proposed modifications to the schedule outlined in the initial Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order issued by the court at the commencement of the action. The parties additionally should be prepared to discuss Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) pursuant to L.R. 16.4. Pursuant to this minute order the parties are relieved of their responsibility set forth in the Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, Section (c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Anderson, David) |
Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Anderson, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Wal-Mart Stores Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kf) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 3/8/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/8/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 4/8/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (kf) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5627825 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Paul Olsovsky against Paul Olsovsky (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Sims, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Olsovsky v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc | |
Represented By: | David Arden Anderson |
Represented By: | W. Michael Gillette |
Represented By: | Jessica Schuh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Paul Olsovsky | |
Represented By: | Shannon D. Sims |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.