Engweiler v. Thompson
Petitioner: Conrad R. Engweiler
Respondent: Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Steve Brower and Sid Thompson
Case Number: 6:2019cv00132
Filed: January 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2019 Filing 7 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Sid Thompson. Filed by Sid Thompson. (Larsen, Lynn)
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(2254) #5 on respondent. Signed on 3/19/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service Form, #2 Amended Petition) (Scheduling Order Mailed to Pro Se party on 3/20/2019.) (joha)
February 12, 2019 Filing 5 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Conrad R. Engweiler against Sid Thompson, Steve Brower. (kf)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Petitioner has failed to name the proper respondent. Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall file an Amended Habeas Corpus Petition naming as Respondents his current parole officer and the chairperson of the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Sid Thompson. Petitioner is advised that the failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/4/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Copy of order mailed to Petitioner.) (gw)
January 29, 2019 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Mailing Case Assignment Notice #2 to Engweiler. (kf)
January 29, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (kf)
January 28, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). Filing Fee in amount of $5 collected. Receipt No. 12746 issued. Filed by Conrad R. Engweiler against Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. (kf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engweiler v. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Brower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sid Thompson
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Conrad R. Engweiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?