Goertzen v. Bagley et al
| Mr Niklas Goertzen and Niklas Goertzen |
| Deschutes County Circuit Court, Deschutes County, Beth M. Bagley and Beth Bagley |
| 6:2019cv00273 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Declaration of Marlin Ard . Filed by Niklas Goertzen. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to a Motion #15 .) (Ard, Marlin) |
| Filing 15 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #14 . Filed by Niklas Goertzen. (Ard, Marlin) |
| Filing 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by Deschutes County. (Laherty, John) |
| Filing 13 Response to Motion for Appointment of Counsel #11 , Motion for Appointment of Counsel #9 . Filed by Beth Bagley, Deschutes County Circuit Court. (Kidd, Justin) |
| Filing 12 Reply on State's Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Beth Bagley, Deschutes County Circuit Court. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #10 , Motion to Dismiss #8 .) (Kidd, Justin) |
| Filing 11 Amended Motion for Appointment of Counsel . Filed by Niklas Goertzen. (Ard, Marlin) Modified on 4/1/2019 to add Language (sb). |
| Filing 10 Response to Motion to Dismiss #8 oral argument requested. Filed by Niklas Goertzen. (Ard, Marlin) |
| Filing 9 Motion for Appointment of Counsel . Filed by Niklas Goertzen. (Ard, Marlin) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss . Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Deschutes County Circuit Court, Beth Bagley. (Kidd, Justin) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #5 . Answer is due by 4/12/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
| Filing 6 Declaration of John E. Laherty in Support of Motion for Extenstion of Time. Filed by Deschutes County. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #5 .) (Laherty, John) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, #1 . Filed by Deschutes County. (Laherty, John) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Association of Attorney Matthew A. Maile,Matthew A. Maile for Deschutes County Circuit Court,Matthew A. Maile for Beth Bagley. Filed by Deschutes County Circuit Court, Beth Bagley. (Maile, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Acceptance/Acknowledgement of Service of Complaint, #1 , Discovery order,, #2 on Beth Bagley served on 3/7/2019 Filed by Deschutes County Circuit Court; Beth Bagley. (Kidd, Justin) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/25/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 7/25/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 7/25/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued) (kf)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5749154 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Niklas Goertzen against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons). (Ard, Marlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
