Sandgathe v. Landrum
Plaintiff: Joseph D Sandgathe
Defendant: Kay Landrum
Case Number: 6:2019cv00366
Filed: March 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mustafa T Kasubhai
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Pro Se party address not provided for mailing.) (kf)
March 11, 2019 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel filed by Joseph D Sandgathe. (kf)
March 11, 2019 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP filed by Joseph D Sandgathe. (kf)
March 11, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Joseph D Sandgathe against Kay Landrum (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (kf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandgathe v. Landrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kay Landrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph D Sandgathe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?