Stapp v. Hendricks
Petitioner: Casey Jonathan Stapp
Respondent: Kimberly Hendricks
Case Number: 6:2019cv00800
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Kristina Hellman is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lisa Hay Filed by Casey Jonathan Stapp. (Hellman, Kristina)
June 10, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Nick M. Kallstrom is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen Filed by Kimberly Hendricks. (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
June 6, 2019 Filing 8 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Kimberly Hendricks. Filed by Kimberly Hendricks. (Larsen, Lynn)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #1 on respondent. Answer is due by 8/2/2019. Signed on 6/3/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment Form, #2 Petition) (Mailed to Petitioner on 6/3/2019.) (gw)
June 3, 2019 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice via interoffice mail to Federal Public Defender for the District of Oregon of Order (ECF No. #5 ) and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 (ECF No. #1 ). (gw)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: This Court DENIES as moot Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) because he paid the requisite $5.00 filing fee. This Court GRANTS Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ). The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent petitioner in this proceeding. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B). Signed on 6/3/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Attachment: #1 Petition) (Mailed to Petitioner on 6/3/2019.) (gw)
May 23, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 5/23/2019.) (joha)
May 22, 2019 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Casey Jonathan Stapp. (joha)
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Casey Jonathan Stapp. (joha)
May 22, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected. Receipt No. 83798 issued. Filed by Casey Jonathan Stapp against Kimberly Hendricks. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stapp v. Hendricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kimberly Hendricks
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Nicholas M. Kallstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Casey Jonathan Stapp
Represented By: Kristina S. Hellman
Represented By: Lisa Hay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?