Algee v. Oregon Department of Human Services
| Tori Algee |
| 6:2019cv00848 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Title VII claims for disparate impact and constructive discharge are dismissed. Plaintiff's Title VII claim for retaliation is dismissed insofar as it challenges the decision not to appoint Plaintiff as the Interim Director of OCI. Defendant's Motion is otherwise denied. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time 32 is GRANTED. Signed on 7/8/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Algee v. Oregon Department of Human Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tori Algee | |
| Represented By: | Erious Johnson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
