Nicholson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
James Donald Nicholson |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
6:2019cv00968 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Stacie F Beckerman |
Marco A Hernandez |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kf) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ). Signed on 8/6/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw) |
Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Marco A. Hernandez to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (eo) |
Filing 7 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.. |
Filing 6 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (kf) |
Filing 5 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Karl E. Osterhout (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: keosterhout. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (ck) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Karl E. Osterhout for James Donald Nicholson. Application Fee in amount of $300 collected. Receipt No. 0979-5898427 issued. Signed on 6/21/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ck) |
Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5898427. Filed by James Donald Nicholson. (Bordelon, Jeremy) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by James Donald Nicholson. (Bordelon, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by James Donald Nicholson against Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Attachment USM Form 1, #4 Attachment USM Form 2, #5 Attachment USM Form 3). (Bordelon, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nicholson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Donald Nicholson | |
Represented By: | Jeremy L. Bordelon |
Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.