Studebaker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Timothy L. Studebaker |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
6:2019cv00988 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
John V Acosta |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance of Ryan Ta Lu appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Lu, Ryan) |
Filing 10 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/19/2019, answer due on 11/18/2019. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney. (kf) |
Filing 9 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/23/2019. Service specifically made upon U.S. Attorney General. (kf) |
Filing 8 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/19/2019. Service specifically made upon Regional Counsel or Agency. (kf) |
Filing 7 Service Papers Received. Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service. (jw) |
Filing 6 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.. |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kf) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 6/26/19 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (kf) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Timothy L. Studebaker. (Rebers, Robyn) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Timothy L. Studebaker against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Rebers, Robyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Studebaker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Studebaker | |
Represented By: | Robyn M. Rebers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
Represented By: | Ryan Ta Lu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.