Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Christina M. Scott
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2019cv01069
Filed: July 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance of Alexis L. Toma appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Toma, Alexis)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order for Administrative Correction of the Record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) regarding Summons/Service Return (#6 ) and (#8 ). A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: Incorrect PDFs were attached. The following corrections were made to the record: Corrected PDFs have been uploaded and have replaced the incorrect attachments. The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (eo)
July 26, 2019 Filing 8 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/19/2019, answer due on 11/18/2019. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney. (kf) (PDF Replaced on with corrected version on 8/7/2019). (kf)
July 26, 2019 Filing 7 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/23/2019. Service specifically made upon U.S. Attorney General. (kf)
July 26, 2019 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/19/2019. Service specifically made upon Regional Counsel or Agency. (kf) (PDF Replaced on with corrected version on 8/7/2019). (kf)
July 16, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (jw)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (kf)
July 10, 2019 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Christina M. Scott. (Johnson, Drew)
July 10, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Christina M. Scott against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Johnson, Drew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Represented By: Alexis L. Toma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina M. Scott
Represented By: Laurie B. Mapes
Represented By: Drew L. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?