Hejazi v. Lane County Adult Corrections et al
Hamid Michael Hejazi |
Lane County Sheriff's Office, Pre-Trial Services, Lane County Adult Corrections and Lane County |
6:2019cv01451 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Marco A Hernandez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 Motion to be added to Class Action and Given Intervenor Status by Ancle Price Reed. (kf) |
Filing 8 Motion to be Added to Class Action as a Plaintiff and Intervenor by Alexander Daniel Sholberg. (kf) |
Filing 7 Motion to be Added to Class Action as a Plaintiff and Intervenor by Jose Perfecto-Rocha. (kf) |
Filing 6 Motion to be Added to Class Action as a Plaintiff and Intervenor by Danilo Carranza. (kf) |
Filing 5 Motion to be Added to Class Action as a Plaintiff and Intervenor by Julian Lane. (kf) |
Filing 4 Motion to Designate Case as a Class Action. Filed by Hamid Michael Hejazi. (joha) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/10/19.) (kf) |
Filing 2 Motion for Fee Waiver filed by Hamid Michael Hejazi. (kf) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Hamid Michael Hejazi against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.