Wright v. Lane County Parole and Probation et al
Plaintiff: Gregory John Wright
Defendant: State of Oregon, Lane County, Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and Lane County Parole and Probation
Case Number: 6:2019cv01661
Filed: October 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2019 Filing 6 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp #5 sent to Gregory John Wright returned as undeliverable. (dsg)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: The application #2 is DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended application curing the deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended application must bear the Case No. 6: 19-cv-01661-MO. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended application will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 12/4/2019 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed order and IFP application to Pro Se party on 12/5/2019.) (dsg)
October 28, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of defendant's mailing addresses. Filed by Gregory John Wright. (kms)
October 16, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/16/2019.) (jw)
October 16, 2019 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Gregory John Wright. (jw)
October 16, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Gregory John Wright against Lane County, Lane County Parole and Probation, Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, State of Oregon (Attachments: #1 Attachment). (jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Lane County Parole and Probation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Oregon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lane County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lane County Parole and Probation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory John Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?