Grezik v. Synchrony Bank
| Daniel Grezik |
| Synchrony Bank |
| 6:2019cv01730 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: 60-Day Order of Dismissal 7 sent to Daniel Grezik returned as Return to Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/8/2019.) (bd) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order #2 sent to Daniel Grezik returned as Return to Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward. (bd) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Discovery order #3 sent to Daniel Grezik returned as Return to Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward. (bd) |
| Filing 7 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Mary L. Moran. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/8/2019.) (ck) |
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Daniel Grezik. (bd) |
| Filing 5 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Synchrony Bank. (Laurick, James) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Synchrony Bank. (Laurick, James) |
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/26/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/27/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 3/27/2020. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/29/2019.) (bd)
|
|
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 10/29/2019 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/29/2019.) (ck)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19SC43378 from Marion County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-6061029 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Synchrony Bank (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (Laurick, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grezik v. Synchrony Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Grezik | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Synchrony Bank | |
| Represented By: | James P. Laurick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
