Cannon v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Sheryl Lee Cannon
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2020cv00150
Filed: January 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mustafa T Kasubhai
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge..
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jk)
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed on 1/29/2020 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . (jk)
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge..
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE BY THE CLERK: Currently there is partial consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in this case. If the non-consenting party would like to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, the consent form may be found on the court's website at #ord.uscourts.gov/civil-forms and may be filed electronically by using the Consent event under Other Filings/Consent in the Civil menu or delivered to the Clerk's Office by mail or in person. For more information regarding the role of magistrate judges and consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction, see #ord.uscourts.gov/consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. (jk)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (kf)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Sheryl Lee Cannon. (Kerr, Kevin)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Sheryl Lee Cannon against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Kerr, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannon v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheryl Lee Cannon
Represented By: Kevin Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?