Hoge v. Larson et al
Randy L. Hoge, Jr. |
Marion County Jail - Sheriffs Office, Tad Larson and Lt. McDaniels |
6:2020cv00678 |
April 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jolie A Russo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 11 Motion to Add Capicitys. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (joha) |
Filing 10 Motion to Add Tort Claim to Case. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (dsg) |
Filing 9 Motion to Amend Defendants. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (joha) |
Filing 8 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (joha) |
Filing 7 Motion to Remove "Individual Capacity". Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (joha) |
Filing 6 Motion to Remove Damages. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (joha) |
Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 4/23/2020.) (dsg) |
Filing 4 Motion to Add Evidence. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr against Tad Larson, Marion County Jail - Sheriffs Office, McDaniels. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Randy L. Hoge, Jr. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.