Rogers v. Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC et al
Plaintiff: DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant: Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC, Tan Republic and Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC doing business as Tan Republic, an Oregon Limited Liability Company
Case Number: 6:2020cv00809
Filed: May 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael J McShane
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order Dismissing Case: Based upon the Notice of Dismissal #13 , this case is dismissed with prejudice without payment of fees or costs by any party. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
August 7, 2020 Filing 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Filed by Darrell Rogers. (Heller, Shawn)
July 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 . Answer is due by 8/13/2020. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
July 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 as to Paul Karlsgodt. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6932036. Signed on 7/8/2020 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
July 2, 2020 Filing 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Paul Karlsgodt. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6932036. Filed by Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 List of Court Admissions) (Karlsgodt, Paul)
July 2, 2020 Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Paul Karlsgodt. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6932036 #10 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ck)
June 29, 2020 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC. (Hineline, Curt)
June 29, 2020 Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint. Filed by Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC. (Hineline, Curt)
June 15, 2020 Filing 7 Affidavit of Service upon Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC served on 6/5/2020 Filed by Darrell Rogers. (Gorman, Leta)
June 1, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw)
May 28, 2020 Filing 5 Proposed Summons Filed by Darrell Rogers. (Gorman, Leta)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #2 Shawn Alex Heller for Darrell Rogers. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/18/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/19/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 10/19/2020. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (jw)
May 20, 2020 Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Shawn Alex Heller. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6724349. Filed by DARRELL ROGERS. (Gorman, Leta)
May 20, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6724297 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by DARRELL ROGERS against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Gorman, Leta)
May 20, 2020 Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Shawn Alex Heller. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6724349 #2 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ck)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tan Republic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tan Republic Franchise Company, LLC doing business as Tan Republic, an Oregon Limited Liability Company
Represented By: Curt Roy Hineline
Represented By: Paul G. Karlsgodt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARRELL ROGERS
Represented By: Leta E. Gorman
Represented By: Shawn Heller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?