Wilcox et al v. Yon
Richard Shawn Wilcox and Karena Renee Clark |
Jim Yon |
6:2020cv00977 |
June 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel with leave to renew if this case proceeds #3 . ; Denied as Moot Motion for Extension of Time #5 ; Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Plaintiff Karena Renee Clark is dismissed from this action with leave to file a separate action. Within 30 day after receipt of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, failure to do so will result in dismissal of this proceeding. Amended Complaint is due 9/8/2020. Signed on 8/6/2020 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/6/2020.) (jkm) |
Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time. Filed by Richard Shawn Wilcox. (joha) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/18/2020.) (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Richard Shawn Wilcox. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Richard Shawn Wilcox, Karena Renee Clark against Jim Yon (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Richard Shawn Wilcox. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.