Merrill v. Lane Fire Authority et al
Larry W Merrill and Larry W. Merrill |
D. Craig Stoelk, Stoelk Investigation and Consultation, LLC, Terry Ney and Lane Fire Authority |
6:2020cv00984 |
June 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mustafa T Kasubhai |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #11 . Defendants Lane Fire Authority's and Terry Ney's Answer is due by 9/8/2020. (jk) |
Filing 12 Declaration of Ronald W. Downs in Support of Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Filed by Lane Fire Authority, Terry Ney. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #11 .) (Downs, Ronald) |
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Filed by Terry Ney, Lane Fire Authority. (Downs, Ronald) |
Filing 10 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Terry Ney waiver sent on 6/26/2020. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Gould, Erin) |
Filing 9 Affidavit of Service upon Lane Fire Authority served on 6/24/2020 Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Gould, Erin) |
Filing 8 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed Filed by D. Craig Stoelk, Stoelk Investigation and Consultation, LLC. (Hansen, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by D. Craig Stoelk waiver sent on 6/22/2020; Stoelk Investigation and Consultation, LLC waiver sent on 6/22/2020. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Gould, Erin) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Stoelk Investigation and Consultation, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Terry Ney. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Lane Fire Authority. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to D. Craig Stoelk. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/19/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/16/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 11/16/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (bd) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6859627 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Larry W Merrill against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons D. Craig Stoelk Summons, #3 Proposed Summons Terry Ney Summons, #4 Proposed Summons Lane Fire Authority Summons, #5 Proposed Summons Stoelk Investigation Summons). (Gould, Erin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.