Epperson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Candice Marie Epperson and Candice M. Epperson
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2020cv01082
Filed: July 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Referring Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Ann L. Aiken to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (eo)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 7/13/2020, answer due on 11/10/2020. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Mailing and Receipt) (Mapes, Laurie)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Appearance of Thomas M. Elsberry appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Elsberry, Thomas)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (bd)
July 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-6936809. Filed by Candice Marie Epperson against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Mapes, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Epperson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Thomas M. Elsberry
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice Marie Epperson
Represented By: Laurie B. Mapes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice M. Epperson
Represented By: Laurie B. Mapes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?