Bond v. Brown et al
| James Brent Bond |
| Katherine Brown and State of Oregon |
| 6:2020cv01656 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Notice of Readiness for Decision re: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order #2 . Filed by James Brent Bond. (plb)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order #4 sent to James Brent Bond returned as undeliverable - attempted - not known, unable to forward. (jw)
|
|
Filing 5
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by James Brent Bond. (jw)
|
|
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 9/23/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/23/2020.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/23/20.) (eo)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Filed by James Brent Bond. (eo)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. No filing fee or IFP application presented with filing. Filed by James Brent Bond against Katherine Brown, State of Oregon.(eo) (Complaint received electronically per Standing Order 2020-8.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2020: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (jw).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
