Mathews v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Amanda Mathews |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 6:2020cv01839 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel #7 . Signed on 12/3/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 12/4/2020.) (ck)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Amanda Mathews. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Motion Pro Bono Counsel) (jw) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel #3 is DENIED with leave to refile. In the section of the pro bono counsel form that asks plaintiffs to describe the "diligent efforts to obtain legal counsel" that "have been unsuccessful because of [plaintiff's] poverty," plaintiff describes the nature of her poverty but does not describe her diligent but unsuccessful efforts to secure legal counsel for this case. Plaintiff may refile her motion for appointment of counsel. In her renewed motion, plaintiff should explain the steps she has taken to try to find an attorney to represent her in this case. Plaintiff is also advised to review the District of Oregon's Handbook for Self- Represented Parties, which provides guidance and resources for obtaining low- or no-cost legal representation and is available on the District of Oregon's website at https://ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/2015-02-10-16-10-22/information-about-representing-yourself. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/27/2020.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 10/27/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/27/2020.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 4
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/26/2020.) (jw)
|
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Amanda Mathews. (jw) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Amanda Mathews. (jw) |
| Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner. Filed by Amanda Mathews against Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mathews v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Mathews | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
