George v. Highberger
Petitioner: Benjamin James George
Respondent: Joshua Highberger
Case Number: 6:2020cv01976
Filed: November 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Karin J Immergut
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2021 Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Samuel A. Kubernick is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen Filed by Joshua Highberger. (Kubernick, Samuel)
January 6, 2021 Filing 9 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Joshua Highberger. Filed by Joshua Highberger. (Larsen, Lynn)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 on respondent. Answer is due by 3/5/2021. Signed on 12/30/2020 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment, #2 Petition) (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/4/2021.) (dsg)
December 28, 2020 Filing fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 91468 issued. (ljp)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This Court denies George's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ), with leave to renew after Respondent files an answer and responsive brief or if the Court schedules an evidentiary hearing. Signed on 11/16/2020 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/17/2020.) (joha)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This Court DENIES George's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ). George shall submit the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to submit the filing fee shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 11/16/2020 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/17/2020.) (joha)
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/13/2020.) (dsg)
November 12, 2020 Filing 4 Declaration of Benjamin James George. Filed by Benjamin James George. (Related document(s): Motion to Appoint Counsel #3 .) (dsg)
November 12, 2020 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Benjamin James George. (dsg)
November 12, 2020 Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Benjamin James George against Joshua Highberger. (dsg)
November 12, 2020 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Benjamin James George. (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: George v. Highberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin James George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joshua Highberger
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Samuel A. Kubernick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?