Miller et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
| Beverly J Miller, Dwyn E. Miller and Beverly J. Miller |
| Wright Medical Group, Inc,, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc. |
| 6:2020cv02052 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal of Party Wright Medical Group, Inc. Filed by All Defendants. (Lasher, Anna) |
| Filing 11 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by All Defendants. (Lasher, Anna) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #8 . Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 . Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
| Filing 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Dana J. Ash. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7638845. Filed by All Defendants. (Lasher, Anna) |
| Filing 7 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP , Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Danielle N. Bagwell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7638811. Filed by All Defendants. (Lasher, Anna) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Dana J. Ash. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7638845 #8 . Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Danielle N. Bagwell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7638811 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ck) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Wright Medical Technology, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Wright Medical Group, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons to Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; and Wright Medical Group, Inc. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (O'Leary, Leslie) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 3/25/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/26/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 4/26/2021. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (bd)
|
|
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 11/24/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7540280 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Beverly J Miller, Dwyn E. Miller against Wright Medical Group, Inc,, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (O'Leary, Leslie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
