Sharif v. City of Eugene et al
Plaintiff: Muhsin Sharif
Defendant: Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene, Officer Ryan Trullinger and Officer Bo Rankin
Case Number: 6:2021cv00310
Filed: February 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Muhsin Sharif. (dsg)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Muhsin Sharif. (dsg)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: The applications (#1 & #3 ) are DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to continue with this case, he may file an amended application curing the deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended application must bear the Case No. 6:21-cv-00310-HZ. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended application will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward to Plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis with this Order. Signed on 4/5/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Order and IFP Form Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/6/2021.) (joha)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/26/2021.) (bd)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Financial Affidavit (document filed under seal) by Muhsin Sharif. Filed by Muhsin Sharif. (bd)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In Forma Pauperis Pending. Filed by Muhsin Sharif against All Defendants. (bd)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Muhsin Sharif. (bd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharif v. City of Eugene et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eugene Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Eugene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Ryan Trullinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Bo Rankin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muhsin Sharif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?