Walker v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Scott David Walker
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2021cv00345
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Referring Judge: Youlee Yim You
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 4/12/2021, answer due on 8/10/2021. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney. (bd)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 4/23/2021. Service specifically made upon U.S. Attorney General. (bd)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 4/12/2021. Service specifically made upon Regional Counsel or Agency. (bd)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Service Papers Received. Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service. (jw)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #10 Magistrate Consent by Party,. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The document was missing a case caption. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (cw)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Marco A. Hernandez to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (eo)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (Main Document 10 replaced on 3/15/2021) (cw). (Main Document 10 replaced on 3/15/2021) (cw).
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect PDF was attached listing the incorrect local counsel. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment. (cw)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Granting Karl E. Osterhout's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #5 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect PDF was attached. The following corrections were made to the record: The original filing was submitted on an outdated form and has been replaced with the current form. (cw)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7982684. Filed by Scott David Walker. (Baird, Jeffrey) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/10/2021) (cw). (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/10/2021) (cw).
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7982684 #5 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ck)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jw)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Scott Walker. (Baird, Jeffrey)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Scott Walker against Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Baird, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott David Walker
Represented By: Jeffrey Hugh Baird
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?